Management and Health services

Question One

Accepting the $10 million donations will help Children’s Hospital facilitate the purchasing of specialized equipment, building amenities and sponsor therapies that meet the needs and wants of children; thus, maintaining their health as well as improving children’s lives in the hospital. Additionally, donations are essential in supporting research on deadly diseases affecting children and finding a cure for childhood ailments which has the effects of restoring the wellbeing of children. Furthermore, receiving donations from Ashley and Mitch clothing will help Children’s Hospital give back to the community through the use of mobile vans, wellness screening, and spreading awareness ways of preventing and managing deadly diseases affecting children’s lives.

The major disadvantage of accepting donations for naming rights in Children’s Hospital faces the challenges of understanding the terms and keeping up with the givers after donations. In this case, changing the name of the Children’s Hospital department to donor’s desire does no good according to her mission. It raises moral concerns as clothes promoted are considered not suitable for preteens and teens. Also, donors later ask for additional favours after contributing since they argue they have taken part in controlling and developing the hospital.

Question Two

The most appropriate donations without naming rights for Ashley and Mitch clothing would be volunteering and delivering items to the Children’s Hospital. Volunteering enables staff members to mingle with hospital workers and patients through executing lighter duties such as maintaining hospital compound thorough cleaning as well as offering support and giving hope to patients through sharing ideas and opinions. Volunteering does not necessarily involve naming rights. Also, the cloth’s company can donate through giving items such as clothes, vehicles, and furniture to the hospital thus improving the services to better the lives of children as well as giving back to the community. In this case, the items given are intended to help children, and naming rights are significant.


Question Three

 Communities are significant in establishing donation guidelines to hospitals since they share the mutual benefits of delivering better healthcare to people. The collaboration between communities and hospital on donation guidelines help improve social-economic issues, reduce costs to the residents, and offer better healthcare to the community. Conversely, the community offers significant information on their preferences of donations since it provides consumers and lay guidelines on moral issues affecting the society. Donation by Ashley and Mitch clothing is considered substantial since the amount has the capabilities of improving the Children Hospital but naming rights are viewed to create moral concerns as clothes advertised do not reach the standards advocated by Donna Taylor. Therefore, engaging communities in developing donation guidelines will improve relations and a sense of belonging since hospitals cannot work without communities and vice versa.

Question Four

Guidelines and rules should not govern companies and industries willing to donate money and assistance in hospitals as the art of giving donations in hospitals comes willingly from those with capabilities to help. Money donations in hospitals take the initiative of improving the quality of life and patients’ wellbeing; thus, hospitals should not shun away from these contributions. Strict guidelines lower morale for donors willing to give as well as rendering them contribute against their will. The motive behind donating money to hospitals should be put into consideration rather than employing unnecessary guidelines limiting donors from contributing. The motive for donating should go hand in hand with specifications attributed to bringing mutual benefits to hospitals and donors.