Feedback in Decision-Making 

My strengths in Writing Request for Proposal and Areas for Professional Development

If someone does it regularly, they will most likely lose to somebody who recognizes the description and how the phrases are utilized in the Request for proposal. For instance, should the method meet all of the Request For Proposal’s criteria, someone may consider this a proposal strength. But one could be mistaken. Compliance with the Request for proposal is the absolute requirement(Wall & Solutions, 2014). This is not a skill. A proposal’s strength must show relevance to the client above and beyond the requirements. Becoming educated is not a strength either. However, one may use their abilities to their advantage. All that one need’s to do is demonstrate how they distinguish the solution and describe how the buyer profits from it. Simply expressing why you do something can help turn it around.

Simply clarifying why I do something may convert it to become a strength if the rationale helps the consumer. Each trade-off choice represents a prospective strength. If the service fits the demand, each element is unlikely to be a strength. Nevertheless, if  I perform something that the consumer demands in a creative or greater method, the cause why this is preferable renders it a strength. Proposal preparation is neither simply defining the strategy nor outlining all of the characteristics in the expectation that the buyer would select several out and term these “strengths.” Proposal writing is all about expressing issues so that they meet the consumer’s idea of a strength(Wall & Solutions, 2014). To win the assessment, every proposal element must be written to highlight as many strengths as possible. One may achieve this easily by identifying their distinguishing features and showing how their strategy outperforms the competition. It functions better if they create their design to highlight key statements using font, structuring emphasis, text fields, etc.

Importance of Adhering to the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation standards

Accuracy standards guarantee that an examination will uncover and transmit technologically appropriate data about the aspects that define the system’s worth or quality. The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Assessment creates assessment guidelines and works to increase the level of regulated testing (Lane, 2016). Standards producing associations are formed to design, promulgate, alter, and reissue technological specifications that belong to a certain business or sector of the chosen profession (Spaulding, 2013). The Joint Committee was formed with the specific goal of creating high standards in intellectual development. It is made up of a partnership of 14 expert organizations concerned with evaluation effectiveness. The American Educational Research Association, the National Council on Measurement in Education, and the American Psychological Association are among the organizations that have sponsored the event.

It must be emphasized that standard assertions should not express the complete scope of whatever Standard. The document contains thorough recommendations and concepts for implementing the criteria in real-world evaluation settings (Yarbrough et al., 2011).  The JCSEE highly urges all assessors and evaluations consumer to study the whole text to become acquainted with the philosophical and actual basis of those standards and applicable applicability to wider instances. The Standards guide assessors in preparing and conducting program evaluating initiatives and assessing consumers in understanding what to anticipate from the review process and deliverables(Yarbrough et al., 2011). Like most people, we know the usefulness of brief guidelines for transferring principles to action from our experience producing and delivering assessment education. This presents reflection questions for every Standard to evaluators. The accuracy requirements are designed to assure that an evaluation will uncover and transmit practically appropriate data about the aspects that define the worth or quality of the program under consideration.

References

Lane, D. (2016). Introduction to Evaluation Plans for Grant Proposals. Retrieved from https://www.northeastipm.org/ipm-planning/evaluation/introduction-to-evaluation-plans-for-grant-proposals/

Spaulding, D. T. (2013). Program evaluation in practice: Core concepts and examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Wall, J. E., & Solutions, S. (2014). Program evaluation model 9-step process. Sage Solutions. Http://Region11s4. Lacoe. Edu/Attachments/Article/34, 287(29), 209.

Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2011). Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation–the program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.